Bugs in production, missed releases, and no clear QA process are fixable problems. We embed with your team, build the structure, and give you the confidence to ship on time.
Most teams don't have a QA problem. They have a process problem. If any of these sound familiar, it's worth a conversation.
Late releases compound. Every slip costs more than the last
Defects are surfacing late in the cycle, after dev is "done." At that point, fixes are expensive, re-testing takes days, and go-live dates move again.
No coverage trail = no sign-off defensibility
Developers test their own code with no consistent coverage criteria. There is no trail, no sign-off process, and no way to know what was actually verified before shipping.
Every escaped defect erodes user trust
Your users are finding issues your team did not catch. Every escaped defect is a support ticket, a hotfix, and a hit to user trust that compounds over time.
Shipping blind is not a strategy
Without defined exit criteria and documented coverage, release decisions become gut calls. The team ships and hopes, rather than ships and knows.
Unverified HIPAA/WCAG = legal exposure
WCAG, HIPAA, SOC 2, or data privacy requirements need to be tested against, not just acknowledged. Assumed compliance is a liability waiting to surface at the wrong moment.
QA debt grows faster than headcount
More developers means more code to verify. Hiring a full-time QA team takes months and carries overhead you may not need long-term. Embedded consultants close the gap immediately.
Three phases that take your team from reactive bug-fixing to deliberate, documented quality.
We start by understanding your actual situation. That means reviewing your tech stack, release cadence, how your team currently handles testing, and where the biggest gaps are. We do not write a single test case until we have a clear picture of what is worth testing first.
We define what "ready to ship" means for your product. That includes a test plan with prioritized coverage areas, tool recommendations (Jira, TestRail, Xray, or whatever fits your stack), and clear entry and exit criteria so no one is guessing when a release is actually done.
We run structured test cycles, file defects with full reproduction steps and severity context, and work alongside your developers in real time. Nothing gets signed off until the coverage is complete and the numbers back it up.
We review your tech stack, release cadence, and current testing to find the biggest gaps. No test cases until we know what matters most.
We define "ready to ship" for your product -- test plan, tool recommendations, and clear entry/exit criteria so no one guesses when a release is done.
Structured test cycles, defects with full repro steps, and real-time collaboration with your developers. Nothing ships until coverage is complete.
We have been doing this across healthcare, legal tech, fintech, and eCommerce since 2009. Here is what that experience looks like in practice.
We work inside your Slack, Jira, and sprint cycles from day one. There is no handoff lag, no translation layer, and no separate "QA track" running behind your team.
We have tested healthcare portals against HIPAA requirements, legal billing systems handling millions in transactions, and cannabis platforms with strict regulatory constraints. The domain knowledge is already there.
Every test case, defect report, and release sign-off document is yours. When the engagement ends, you have a working QA process, not a dependency on us to keep it running.
Long-term retainer, sprint-by-sprint support, or a focused pre-launch engagement. We scope the work to fit your team size, budget, and timeline rather than selling a fixed package.
"STS has worked as Dotfusion's end-to-end QA and QC partner for over a year. They bring a proactive approach to problem-solving that has helped us identify and address potential issues early on, which has saved us a great deal of time and resources."
Trusted by leading organizations
"The STS team are consummate professionals and their quality assurance process is rock solid. They provide not only a deep level of expertise in testing, both manual and automated, but they also bring project leadership with an approach that pulls deliverables into QA rather than waiting for them to arrive. It's nuance, but it makes a world of difference."
"The STS team was instrumental in helping us accelerate the maturity of our QA function here at Inkblot. They partnered with our internal QA team to create documentation, implement processes, and drive the adoption of tools that allowed us to leverage their leadership to develop our own QA expertise."
We've worked in regulated, high-stakes industries long enough to know where the real risk lives in each one. Generic test coverage doesn't cut it here.
Patient portals, care coordination, clinical software
Billing systems, Elite 3E, Intapp, matter management
Regulated platforms, POS systems, compliance workflows
Payment infrastructure, financial data platforms
Transaction flows, mobile checkout, platform migrations
The most common trigger is a bad release: bugs escaped, users complained, and the team had no clear record of what was actually tested. But the better time to engage is before that happens. Specifically: before a major launch, before you scale the dev team, or when your release cadence is increasing faster than your QA coverage. The earlier you put structure in place, the cheaper quality problems become to prevent.
On a typical day, an STS consultant is writing or executing test cases, filing defects in your tracking tool with full reproduction steps, attending sprint planning to review acceptance criteria before development starts, and producing coverage reports you can share with stakeholders. They work in your Jira, TestRail, or Xray instance and communicate directly with your dev and product teams. There is no separate reporting layer or weekly status call where information goes to die.
Short engagements (6 to 10 weeks) are scoped around a specific launch or release cycle. Longer retainers (6 to 18 months) are for teams that want ongoing embedded QA coverage as their product evolves. We scope based on your release frequency, product surface area, and team size. Most clients who start with a fixed project end up extending because the coverage pays for itself quickly.
Yes, and this is how most of our engagements are structured. We join your standup, work in your sprint board, and coordinate directly with your developers when defects need clarification. We are not a separate external team sending reports. The goal is to function like a QA hire without the recruiting process, ramp time, or long-term overhead.
Healthcare, legal technology (billing systems, matter management, integrations with platforms like Elite 3E and Intapp), fintech, eCommerce, and cannabis. These verticals have meaningfully different compliance and quality requirements. A consultant who only knows how to test software is less useful than one who understands why a specific workflow matters in your industry.
A 30-minute call is usually enough to diagnose the problem and give you a clear picture of what we would do. No pitch deck, no obligation.